Global city

A global city (also called world city or sometimes alpha city or world center) is a city generally considered to be an important node in the global economic system. The concept comes from geography and urban studies and rests on the idea that globalization can be understood as largely created, facilitated and enacted in strategic geographic locales according to a hierarchy of importance to the operation of the global system of finance and trade.

The most complex of these entities is the "global city", whereby the linkages binding a city have a direct and tangible effect on global affairs through socio-economic means.[1] The terminology of "global city", as opposed to megacity, was popularized by the sociologist Saskia Sassen in reference to her 1991 work, "The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo"[2] though the term "world city" to describe cities which control a disproportionate amount of global business dates to at least May 1886, to a description of Liverpool by the Illustrated London News.[3] Patrick Geddes also used the term "world city" later in 1915.[4] Cities can fall from such categorization, as in the case of cities that have become less cosmopolitan and less internationally renowned in the current era, e.g., Kaliningrad, Russia; Thessaloniki, Greece; and Alexandria, Egypt.

Contents

Criteria

Global City or world city status is seen as beneficial, and because of this many groups have tried to classify and rank which cities are seen as 'world cities' or 'non-world cities'.[4] Although there is a consensus upon leading world cities,[5] the criteria upon which a classification is made can affect which other cities are included.[4] The criteria for identification tend either to be based on a "yardstick value" ("e.g., if the producer-service sector is the largest sector, then city X is a world city")[4] or on an "imminent determination" ("if the producer-service sector of city X is greater than the producer-service sector of N other cities, then city X is a world city").[4]

Economic characteristics

Political characteristics

Cultural characteristics

Infrastructural characteristics

Studies

GaWC studies

The first attempt to define, categorize, and rank global cities using 'relational data' was made in 1998 by Jon Beaverstock, Richard G Smith and Peter Taylor, who all worked at that time at Loughborough University in the United Kingdom. Together they established the Globalization and World Cities Research Network. A roster of world cities was outlined in the GaWC Research Bulletin 5 and ranked cities based on their connectivity through four "advanced producer services": accountancy, advertising, banking/finance, and law.[5] The GaWC inventory identifies three levels of global cities and several sub-ranks. This roster generally denotes cities in which there are offices of certain multinational corporations providing financial and consulting services rather than denoting other cultural, political, and economic centres.

The 2004 rankings acknowledged several new indicators while continuing to rank city economics more heavily than political or cultural factors. The 2008 roster, similar to the 1998 version, is sorted into categories of "Alpha" world cities (with four sub-categories), "Beta" world cities (three sub-categories), "Gamma" world cities (three sub-categories), and additional cities with "High sufficiency" or "Sufficiency" world city presence.

The 2010 roster of leading Alpha, Beta and Gamma world cities is as follows: [29]

A map showing the distribution of GaWC-ranked world cities (2010 data).
Category Cities
Alpha++ London, New York City
Alpha+ Chicago, Dubai, Hong Kong, Paris, Shanghai, Singapore, Sydney and Tokyo
Alpha Amsterdam, Beijing, Brussels, Buenos Aires, Frankfurt, Kuala Lumpur, Los Angeles, Madrid, Mexico City, Milan, Moscow, Mumbai, San Francisco, São Paulo, Seoul, Toronto and Washington
Alpha- Atlanta, Bangkok, Barcelona, Boston, Dallas, Dublin, Istanbul, Jakarta, Johannesburg, Lisbon, Melbourne, Miami, Munich, New Delhi, Philadelphia, Santiago, Taipei, Vienna, Warsaw and Zurich
Beta+ Athens, Bangalore, Berlin, Bogota, Cairo, Copenhagen, Düsseldorf, Hamburg, Houston, Manila, Montreal, Prague, Rome, Stockholm, Tel Aviv and Vancouver
Beta Auckland, Beirut, Bucharest, Budapest, Cape Town, Caracas, Chennai, Guangzhou, Ho Chi Minh City, Karachi, Kyiv, Lima, Luxembourg, Manchester, Minneapolis, Montevideo, Oslo, Riyadh and Seattle
Beta− Abu Dhabi, Birmingham, Bratislava, Brisbane, Kolkata, Calgary, Casablanca, Cleveland, Cologne, Denver, Detroit, Geneva, Guatemala City, Helsinki, Lagos, Manama, Monterrey, Nicosia, Osaka, Panama City, Perth, Port Louis, Rio de Janeiro, San Diego, San Juan, Shenzhen, Sofia, St. Louis and Stuttgart
Gamma+ Adelaide, Amman, Antwerp, Baltimore, Belgrade, Bristol, Charlotte, Cincinnati, Doha, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Hanoi, Hyderabad, Jeddah, Kuwait, Lahore, Nairobi, Portland, Riga, San José, San Jose, Tunis and Zagreb
Gamma Almaty, Columbus, Edmonton, Guadalajara, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Leeds, Lyon, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Quito, Rotterdam, San Salvador, Santo Domingo, St. Petersburg, Tampa, Valencia and Vilnius
Gamma− Accra, Austin, Belfast, Colombo, Curitiba, Durban, George Town, Gothenburg, Guayaquil, Islamabad, Ljubljana, Marseille, Milwaukee, Muscat, Nagoya, Orlando, Ottawa, Porto, Porto Alegre, Pune, Richmond, VA, Southampton, Tallinn, Tegucigalpa, Turin and Wellington

Global Cities Index

In 2008, the American journal Foreign Policy, in conjunction with consulting firm A.T. Kearney and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, published a ranking of global cities, based on consultation with Saskia Sassen, Witold Rybczynski, and others. Foreign Policy noted that "the world’s biggest, most interconnected cities help set global agendas, weather transnational dangers, and serve as the hubs of global integration. They are the engines of growth for their countries and the gateways to the resources of their regions."[30]

In 2010 the index was updated, and the top thirty ranked were:[31][32]

Rank City Score
1 New York City 6.22
2 London 5.86
3 Tokyo 5.42
4 Paris 5.35
5 Hong Kong 4.14
6 Chicago 3.94
7 Los Angeles 3.90
8 Singapore 3.45
9 Sydney 3.44
10 Seoul 3.40
11 Brussels 3.29
12 San Francisco 3.26
13 Washington, D.C. 3.25
14 Toronto 3.13
15 Beijing 3.12
16 Berlin 3.03
17 Madrid 3.02
18 Vienna 2.96
19 Boston 2.78
20 Frankfurt 2.78
20 Shanghai 2.78
22 Buenos Aires 2.73
23 Stockholm 2.71
24 Zurich 2.68
25 Moscow 2.61
26 Barcelona 2.57
27 Dubai 2.56
28 Rome 2.56
29 Amsterdam 2.54
30 Mexico City 2.41

Global Power City Index

The Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation in Tokyo, Japan issued a comprehensive study of global cities in 2010. The ranking is based on six overall categories, "Economy", "Research & Development", "Cultural Interaction", "Livability", "Ecology & Natural Environment", and "Accessibility", with 69 individual indicators among them.[33] This Japanese ranking also breaks down top ten world cities ranked in subjective categories such as "manager, researcher, artist, visitor and resident."

Rank City Score Best category (position)
1 New York City 322.6 Economy (1.) Research & Development (1.)
2 London 313.6 Cultural Interaction (1.)
3 Paris 303.1 Accessibility (1.)
4 Tokyo 300.3 Economy (2.) Research & Development (2.)
5 Singapore 244.2 Accessibility (4.)
6 Berlin 232.9 Ecology & Natural Environment (3.)
7 Amsterdam 230.8 Accessibility (5.)
8 Seoul 228.5 Research & Development (5.)
9 Hong Kong 223.8 Economy (5.)
10 Sydney 219.0 Ecology & Natural Environment (11.)
11 Vienna 217.4 Ecology & Natural Environment (7.)
12 Zurich 215.0 Ecology & Natural Environment (1.)
13 Frankfurt 212.3 Accessibility (7.)
14 Los Angeles 210.7 Research & Development (7.)
15 Madrid 208.8 Ecology & Natural Environment (10.)
16 Vancouver 208.4 Livability (1.)
17 Copenhagen 206.3 Livability (9.)
18 Osaka 205.6 Livability (3.)
19 Geneva 205.4 Ecology & Natural Environment (2.)
20 Boston 203.3 Research & Development(4.)

World City Survey

In 2010 the London based estate agent Knight Frank LLP together with the Citibank published a survey of world cities.[34] The Wealth Report 2010, which includes the World City Survey, assesses four parameters — economic activity, political power, knowledge and influence, and quality of life. The list aimed to rank the world's 40 most influential cities. New York tops the list in Economic activity, political power and knowledge and Paris tops it in quality of life. London and Paris get the same aggregate ranking of 149, making them de facto world's 2nd and 3rd most prominent cities.[35] In 2011, the list was updated, and the top 20 cities ranked are:[36]

Rank City Best category
1 New York City Economic activity
2 London Economic activity
3 Paris Quality of life
4 Tokyo Economic activity
5 Brussels Political power
6 Los Angeles Knowledge and influence
7 Singapore Economic activity
8 Beijing Political power
9 Toronto Quality of life
10 Berlin Quality of life
11 Chicago Knowledge and influence
12 Washington, D.C. Political power
13 Seoul Economic activity
14 Frankfurt Quality of life
15 Sydney Knowledge and influence
16 San Francisco Knowledge and influence
17 Hong Kong Economic activity
18 Shanghai Economic activity
19 Mexico City Political power
20 Bangkok Political power

Cities ranked by category

Rank Population of city proper[37] Population of metropolitan area[38] Foreign born population[39] Expatriate cost of living (most expensive first)[10] Metro systems by annual passenger ridership Metro systems by total route length Airport systems by annual passenger traffic Number of billionaires (U.S. dollars)[11] Gross Metropolitan Product at total PPPs[40]
1 Shanghai Tokyo Dubai Luanda Tokyo Shanghai London Moscow Tokyo
2 Karachi Seoul Toronto Tokyo Moscow London New York City New York City New York City
3 Mumbai Mexico City Hong Kong N'Djamena Seoul New York City Tokyo London Los Angeles
4 Beijing New York City Miami Moscow Shanghai Beijing Atlanta Hong Kong Chicago
5 Moscow Mumbai Los Angeles Geneva Beijing Berlin Paris Istanbul Paris
6 Istanbul Jakarta Riyadh Osaka New York City Seoul Chicago Mumbai,
São Paulo
London
7 São Paulo São Paulo Sydney Zurich Paris Tokyo Los Angeles Mexico City Osaka
8 Tianjin Delhi San Francisco Singapore Mexico City Moscow Beijing Taipei,
Los Angeles,
Beijing
Mexico City
9 Guangzhou Osaka Melbourne Hong Kong Hong Kong Madrid Shanghai n/a Philadelphia
10 Shenzhen Shanghai London São Paulo Guangzhou Guangzhou Dallas n/a Washington, D.C.

See also

References

  1. ^ Sassen, Saskia - The global city: strategic site/new frontier
  2. ^ Sassen, Saskia - The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. (1991) - Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-07063-6
  3. ^ UK History
  4. ^ a b c d e Doel, M. & Hubbard, P., (2002), "Taking World Cities Literally: Marketing the City in a Global Space of flows", City, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 351-368. Subscription required
  5. ^ a b GaWC Research Bulletin 5, GaWC, Loughborough University, 28 July 1999
  6. ^ Urban Characteristics,City Level, 1993PDF (61.6 KB), "World Resources 1998-99", WRI, 1998.
  7. ^ Global Urban Indicators Database 2 (1998 data) (data sets in .ZIP), UN-HABITAT
  8. ^ World Indices, Bloomberg
  9. ^ J.V. Beaverstock, World City Networks 'From Below', GaWC, Loughborough University, 29 September 2005
  10. ^ a b Worldwide Cost of Living survey 2011 - City rankings, Mercer, 12 July 2011
  11. ^ a b Moscow Leads Cities With Most Billionaires, Forbes, 17 May 2011
  12. ^ Chapter 5: Globalization and cultural choicePDF (352 KB), "2004 Human Development Report" (page 99), UNDP, 2004
  13. ^ Chapter 9: Urban DataPDF (196 KB), "World Resources 1998-99", WRI, 1998
  14. ^ City Profiles, UN
  15. ^ Mobility 2001PDF (1.59 MB), WBCSD
  16. ^ WORLD URBANIZATION PROSPECTS: THE 2003 REVISIONPDF (3.73 MB), UN, 2004
  17. ^ World-wide quality of living survey, Mercer, 10 April 2006
  18. ^ The city development indexPDF, "THE STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES REPORT 2001", UN-HABITAT, 21 June 2006
  19. ^ P. De Groote, Economic and Tourism Aspects of the Olympic Games, GaWC, Loughborough University, 21 September 2005
  20. ^ [1]PDF (registration required)
  21. ^ K. O'Connor, International Students and Global Cities, GaWC, Loughborough University, 17 February 2005
  22. ^ World Heritage List, UNESCO
  23. ^ Estimated Ridership of the World’s Largest Public Transit Systems, 1998
  24. ^ COMMUTER RAIL (SUBURBAN RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL) IN THE UNITED STATES: INTERNATIONAL CONTEXTPDF (218 KB), October 2003
  25. ^ Traffic Intensity by International Urban Area: 1990
  26. ^ Largest seaports of the world
  27. ^ Mapping the Global Network Economy on the Basis of Air Passenger Transport Flows, GaWC, Loughborough University, 8 December 2004
  28. ^ The World's Best Skylines
  29. ^ "The World According to GaWC 2010". Globalization and World Cities (GaWC) Study Group and Network. Loughborough University. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2010.html. Retrieved 2011-09-15. 
  30. ^ "The 2008 Global Cities Index". Foreign Policy (November/December 2008). October 21, 2008. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4509. Retrieved 2008-10-31. 
  31. ^ The Urban Elite: The A.T. Kearney Global Cities Index 2010
  32. ^ 2010 Global Cities Index
  33. ^ Global Power City Index 2010. Tokyo, Japan: Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation. October, 2010. http://www.mori-m-foundation.or.jp/english/research/project/6/pdf/GPCI2010_English.pdf. Retrieved 2011-08-10. 
  34. ^ The Wealth Report 2010, Knightfrank.com, 25. March 2010
  35. ^ "Revealed: Cities that rule the world". CNN. 2010-04-10. http://www.cnn.com/2010/BUSINESS/04/10/cities.dominate.world/index.html. 
  36. ^ "The Wealth Report 2011". Knight Frank LLP. http://www.knightfrank.com/documents/wealthreport/TheWealthReport2011.pdf. 
  37. ^ "Cities: largest (without surrounding suburban areas)". Geohive. http://www.geohive.com/earth/cy_notagg.aspx. Retrieved 2011-08-03. 
  38. ^ R.L. Forstall, R.P. Greene, and J.B. Pick, "Which are the largest? Why published populations for major world urban areas vary so greatly", City Futures Conference, (University of Illinois at Chicago, July 2004) – Table 5 (p.34)
  39. ^ Global City Migration Map
  40. ^ PriceWaterhouseCoopers, "UK Economic Outlook, March 2007", page 5. "Table 1.2 – Top 30 urban agglomeration GDP rankings in 2005 and illustrative projections to 2020 (using UN definitions and population estimates)" (PDF). Archived from the original on 2007-06-10. http://web.archive.org/web/20070610175146/http://www.ukmediacentre.pwc.com/imagelibrary/downloadMedia.asp?MediaDetailsID=863. Retrieved 2007-03-09. 

External links